Charter Schools
5 min read

3. Which school laws do charter schools have to follow?

3. Which school laws do charter schools have to follow?
Written by
Susan Perkins Weston
Published on
May 11, 2022

Exemption from legal requirements is regularly listed as a key way that charter schools can be different, usually followed by quick disclaimers that some rules will still apply. This post will offer some likely specifics on that.

Here are some important examples of Kentucky rules that charter schools probably will not have to follow:

  • Primary talent pool identification and services for K-3 students (gifted and talented services for older students have to be described in the charter school application)
  • Response to intervention systems for K-3 students
  • Individual learning plans for grade 6-12 students
  • Accelerated learning for students with identified deficiencies or strengths based on state assessments
  • Advanced coursework options (Advanced Placement, International Baccalaureate, dual enrollment, or dual credit)
  • Class size caps
  • State teacher evaluation rules, continuing contracts (tenure), and single salary schedule
  • 2% financial contingency reserves

Charter schools will also be “exempt from administrative regulations governing public schools for purposes of zoning and local land use regulation.” That exemption is direct from state law, and it seems likely to mean that a charter school can select space in any building that meets health and safety rules, without having to fit within existing rules on where homes, businesses, factories, and other uses are allowed.

These kinds of exemptions leave many other rules in place. Legally, “the public charter school shall adhere to the same health, safety, civil rights, and disability rights requirements as are applied to all public schools,” as well as other statutes that specifically say they apply to charter schools. Here are my starting lists of rules that look to me like they will definitely apply.

That’s not a minor set of obligations!

Reasons and procedures for suspensions, expulsions, and services after expulsionmay well be the most important item on those lists. I put them under health and safety because the rules were substantially revised in 1998 as part of the School Safety Act. I also put them under civil and disability rights because education is a fundamental right in Kentucky. That isn’t true in all states, but it’s true here under Article 183 of our Constitution.

Suspension, expulsion and services after expulsion also top my list of legal requirements that should get further attention to work effectively for charter school students and leaders. Under current law, expulsion from public schools is a decision taken by the elected local board of education after a formal hearing. The board also has the obligation to provide services to students after expulsion (unless doing would be dangerous). How will those steps work for a charter school? The law should be clear, but this part of state law was written with no plan for charter schools to exist. Thoughtful amendments ought to be built, with veteran administrators, board members, and student advocates as key players in thinking through consistent and complete approaches.

A concluding note: Here’s an over-arching point about why there are substantial lists of rules to consider: education is a huge undertaking. Of Kentucky’s 4.5 million people, roughly 1 in 6 is actively engaged in that one huge effort: more than 780 thousand students and nearly 70 thousand teachers and other school staff members. Also, the work is profoundly important work: the development of young humans who will be the main builders of our shared future. No one should expect the rules to fit on a cocktail napkin.

Legal Sources: KRS 160.1592 provides the overall exemption and the specific zoning and land use exemption. KRS 160.1592 provides charter schools’ overall exemption, and most of the other requirements. KRS 161.141 specifies that charter school employees will participate in state retirement systems. The other explicit requirements for charter school operation are found in 2022’s Senate Bill 1 (concept and texts), in KRS 158.4416 trauma), and in KRS 158.038 (hotline numbers).

Series Links:

Charter schools: taking on the questions (Introduction)

1. What is a charter school?

2. What student results are charter schools expected to deliver?

3. Which school laws do charter schools have to follow?

4. How can students be admitted to charter schools?

5. Who can authorize charter schools?

6. Who can apply to start a charter school?

7. How can charter schools be closed if they do not deliver?

8. What funding can charter schools receive?

Adding new questions about charter schools (Conclusion)

Subscribe to our newsletter

Stay up to date with our work.

By subscribing, you consent to receive updates from The Prichard Committee.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

Recent posts

Kentucky Test Scores Show Slight Improvement
5 min read

Kentucky Test Scores Show Slight Improvement

Kentucky has seen improvement in four of the measures that the Prichard Committee most closely tracks.

Oct. 3, 2024

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Contact: Lisa McKinney

lisa@prichardcommittee.org

(cell) 859-475-7202

Kentucky Test Scores Show Slight Improvement

Community Accountability Necessary to Quicken the Pace

A statement from Brigitte Blom, President and CEO

LEXINGTON, Ky -- In the new public school learning results data released today by the Kentucky Department of Education, Kentucky has seen improvement in four of the measures that the Prichard Committee most closely tracks. Compared to 2023, the new data release shows:

  • A 2% increase in the kindergarten readiness of students entering school last fall
  • A 1% increase in grade 3 students scoring proficient or above in reading
  • A 1% increase in grade 8 mathematics proficiency
  • A 1% increase in the four-year high school graduation rate

There was no progress on two other priority measures:

  • No increase in grade 3 mathematics proficiency
  • A 3% decline in grade 8 reading proficiency

Even the measures that have improved remain far from Kentucky’s long-term goals. For example, only 47% of 2024 third-grade students were proficient or above in reading. If we continue improving at a pace of 1% each year, it could take 53 years to get all Kentucky students to the proficient level in that foundational subject.The results released today also confirm the urgency of Kentucky’s work to ensure that students of all backgrounds thrive in our schools:

  • Even as grade 3 reading proficiency rose overall, it declined for English learners and for students with disabilities and showed no improvement for economically disadvantaged students and Hispanic or Latino students.  
  • Grade 8 math results also rose overall, but showed no improvement for African American, Hispanic or Latino students and English learners. In slightly better news, economically disadvantaged students and students with disabilities did see grade 8 mathematics improvement that was a bit stronger than that of their classmates.
  • The other indicators provide similar evidence that we have not yet moved beyond our historic failures in closing achievement gaps.

The Prichard Committee will be doing further analysis on postsecondary readiness. It is difficult to compare this year’s 81% readiness rate directly to last year’s 79% rate, because this is the first year that readiness includes students who have been successful in work-based learning. While including that data going forward is beneficial, our analysis will need to consider how it affects year-to-year comparisons. We are also concerned to see that the percent of students reaching ACT benchmarks has declined and look forward to studying those patterns in more depth. If graduation rates remain steady or increase while postsecondary readiness measures decrease, that raises questions about how meaningful Kentucky’s high school diplomas are for preparing students for post-graduation life.

In response to today’s new data, the Prichard Committee urges Kentuckians in every community to review the results and develop new local efforts to ensure that our public schools offer all learners the full opportunities and supports they need to flourish. As a starting point, communities can work together on active family and community engagement, expanded and enriched learning times, integrated supports, and collaborative leadership and practices to support high-quality teaching.

The Prichard Committee also urges stronger state-level policy efforts and financial investments in our public schools. The new LETRS (Read to Succeed) program is off to a promising start, and added funding for kindergarten and school transportation are important starting points, but we need to do more as a commonwealth. Kentucky must deepen our efforts on teaching quality, working conditions, and shortages, and we must strengthen state SEEK funding, including meeting full transportation costs. Now is the time to invest appropriately in public education and ensure public dollars are not being diverted from the public schools that educate the vast majority of Kentucky students.

Overall, Kentucky’s future demands renewed and strengthened commitment to public schools that can equip each and every graduate has the durable skills and the depth of knowledge to succeed as adult learners, as workforce participants, and as contributors to our communities. It is every community members’ responsibility to help build a Big, Bold Future for the commonwealth with education at its core. Let’s get to work.

2024 SNAPSHOTS OF KENTUCKY K-12 RESULTS
5 min read

2024 SNAPSHOTS OF KENTUCKY K-12 RESULTS

This morning, the Kentucky Department of Education released important Kentucky State Assessment (KSA) results...

This morning, the Kentucky Department of Education released important Kentucky State Assessment (KSA) results and other indicators that matter for our public schools. As an added way to see some of the major patterns in that data, the Prichard Committee has created a 2023-24 Snapshot approach to statewide elementary school, middle school, and high school data and showing:

  • The statewide percent of students who scored proficient or distinguished in reading, mathematics, science, social studies, and writing on the 2023 KSA
  • Results for all students, for students who are and are not identified as English learners, for students with and without identified disabilities, for students with and without economic disadvantage, for students in seven groups by race and ethnicity, and for female and male students
  • A single page display for elementary school results and for middle school results
  • A two page display for high school results, with one page for KSA and another for ACT results, graduation rate, and postsecondary readiness rate

Unsurprisingly, the results shows that we have important work ahead to reach 100% proficiency and readiness, and they continue to show differences in how well we are serving students with different backgrounds and needs. For example, here’s a quick look at elementary school reading results, combining grades 3,4, and 5.

If we engage this data with candor and concern, it can strengthen our work to ensure that all Kentucky learners are welcome, respected, and empowered in our public schools.

As communities and as a commonwealth, we need public schools to equip every student in our rising generation to play a full role in Kentucky’s Big Bold Future.

Please do take a look at the new Snapshot data for each level.

The Prichard Committee releases analysis of ‘school choice’ Amendment 2
5 min read

The Prichard Committee releases analysis of ‘school choice’ Amendment 2

The Prichard Committee for Academic Excellence today released an analysis of Amendment 2

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Aug. 20, 2024

Contact: Lisa McKinney

(cell) 859-475-7202

lisa@prichardcommittee.org

The Prichard Committee releases analysis of ‘school choice’ Amendment 2

Committee issues statement of opposition to the amendment

(LEXINGTON, Ky) --The Prichard Committee for Academic Excellence today released an analysis of Amendment 2, a proposed amendment to Kentucky’s Constitution that would allow the allocation of public funds to school choice options beyond traditional public schools. The analysis, which outlines the potential financial and education outcomes of the amendment, found that funding private K12 educational institutions is not an appropriate or effective use of public funds.  

Amendment 2 will appear on ballots in November.  

“An amendment to Kentucky’s constitution that opens the door to private school choice with public dollars is likely to have significantly negative consequences for Kentucky’s long-standing march to improve education outcomes,” said Prichard Committee President/CEO Brigitte Blom. “Diverting public dollars to private school choice options creates the conditions for an unregulated market with no accountability to the taxpayers who fund it, and no durable research that warrants such an investment.”

The amendment's passage would allow the legislature to direct public funds to support private schools (including parochial schools), homeschooling, and charter schools through various financial mechanisms like vouchers, tax credits and education savings accounts.

Diverting funds to private schools is shown to spread scarce resources across more providers, thereby reducing overall access and improvement to quality in education, especially in areas where there is population decline. This will certainly be true in rural areas of the state and could likely be true for the state as a whole with population decline forecasted in the years to come.  

Additionally, Amendment 2 would open the door to the state investing in education options that create barriers for accountability. Public schools are held to accountability standards of which private and parochial schools, as well as homeschools, are currently exempt.    

Research shows that in states with high participation in school choice programs, a significant portion of funds frequently benefit wealthier families, leaving low- and middle-income families with less funding for the public schools these families rely on. Ensuring public funds stay within the public education system supports a fair distribution of resources to help ensure better outcomes for all students, the analysis found.  

Additionally, public schools are required to serve all students, including those with disabilities and the need for additional support. Many private schools are not required to guarantee the same level of support for students with learning differences, and the requirement to serve all children falls back to the public system, with fewer resources.

“Investing state dollars in what works is critical, and even more so in a state like Kentucky where we've risen from the bottom of the national rankings since the 1990s to roughly the middle today,” said Blom. “While there is clearly more work to be done to continue to improve education outcomes - and parents can and must demand that improvement - now is not the time to spend shared public dollars on strategies with no durable outcomes at best - and negative outcomes at worst.”  

Read the Prichard Committee’s full analysis here.