Early Childhood Strategy: Quality Improvement Systems

Early Childhood Strategy: Quality Improvement Systems
Written by
The Prichard Committee
Published on
June 7, 2024

This strategy involves the use of comprehensive frameworksi designed to enhance the quality of ECE programs and services by setting standards, providing supports, and promoting continuous improvementii. These systems aim to promote equity, excellence, and accountability. QI systems improve program quality, support professional development, and ensure positive outcomes for children and familiesiii. They address the following components:

  • Quality Standards: QI systems define clear and measurable quality standards and criteria that ECE programs must meet to ensure high-quality servicesiv. These standards typically cover various aspects of program quality, including health and safety, curriculum and instruction, staff qualifications and professional development, family engagement, and program administrationv.
  • Quality Rating and Improvement Systems (QRIS): QRISvi are a common component of QI systems that assign ratings or levels to ECE programs based on their adherence to quality standards and their performance on key indicators. QRIS use a tiered rating structure (e.g., star ratings) to differentiate levels of quality and provide incentives for programs to improve. QRIS often offer financial incentives, technical assistance, and professional development opportunities to help programs move up in rating levelsvii.
  • Professional Development: QI systems support the ongoing professional development of ECE professionals, including teachers, caregivers, administrators, and support staff. Professional development initiatives may include training workshops, coaching and mentoring, higher education scholarshipsviii, credentialing programs, and continuing education opportunities focused on best practices in early childhood education and developmentix.
  • Technical Assistance and Coaching: QI systems provide technical assistance and coaching to ECE programs to help them improve program quality and meet quality standardsx. Technical assistance may include onsite consultations, program assessments, action planning, and support in implementing evidence-based practices and quality improvement strategies. Coaching provides individualized support to ECE professionals to enhance their teaching practices, classroom management skills, and interactions with children and familiesxi.
  • Quality Improvement Grants and Funding: QI systems often allocate funding and grants to support quality improvement efforts in ECE programsxii. These funds may be used for activities such as purchasing educational materials and supplies, upgrading facilities, implementing curriculum enhancements, and hiring additional staff to meet quality standards and improve program qualityxiii.
  • Data Collection and Assessment: QI systems collect data and conduct assessments to measure program quality, track progress, and inform continuous improvement effortsxiv. This may include conducting environmental assessments, using observation tools to assess teacher-child interactions, administering child assessments to measure developmental outcomes, and gathering feedback from families and stakeholders.
  • Family Engagement: QI systems promote family engagement and partnershipsxv by involving families in the ECE program and decision-making processes. This may include providing opportunities for family involvement in program governance, offering parent education and support services, conducting parent surveys and focus groups, and facilitating communication between families and program staff.
  • Continuous Quality Improvement (CQI): QI systems emphasize a culture of continuous quality improvementxvi, where ECE programs engage in ongoing self-assessment, reflection, and learning to identify areas for improvement and implement changes to enhance program quality. CQI processes involve setting goals, collecting data, analyzing outcomes, making informed decisions, and monitoring progress over time.

Programs and Practices Within This Strategy

See it in Action


[1] Early Childhood Framework for Quality (EFQ). (n.d.). https://infohub.nyced.org/docs/default-source/default-document-library/early-childhood-framework-for-quality.pdf

[2] Slot, P. (2018), "Structural characteristics and process quality in early childhood education and care: A literature review", OECD Education Working Papers, No. 176, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/edaf3793-en.

[3] Fenech, M., Giugni, M., & Bown, K. (2012). A Critical Analysis of the National Quality Framework: Mobilising for a Vision for Children Beyond Minimum Standards. Australasian Journal of Early Childhood, 37(4), 5-14. https://doi.org/10.1177/183693911203700402

[4] ACECQA. (2020). National Quality Framework. Www.acecqa.gov.au. https://www.acecqa.gov.au/national-quality-framework

[5] Wechsler, M., Melnick, H., Maier, A., & Bishop, J. (2016). CALIFORNIA POLICY BRIEF The Building Blocks of High-Quality Early Childhood Education Programs External reviewers. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED606352.pdf

[6] Cannon, J. S., Zellman, G. L., Karoly, L. A., & Schwartz, H. L. (2017). Quality rating and improvement systems for early care and education programs: Making the second generation better. RAND.

[7] Jenkins, J. M., Duer, J. K., & Connors, M. (2021). Who participates in quality rating and improvement systems? Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 54, 219–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2020.09.005

[8] Yazejian, N., & Iruka, I. U. (2015). Associations among tiered quality rating and improvement system supports and quality improvement. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 30, 255–265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2014.05.005

[9] Toward the Identification of Features of Effective Professional Development for Early Childhood Educators Literature Review. (n.d.). https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED527140.pdf

[10] Yang, W., Huang, R., Su, Y., Zhu, J., Hsieh, W., & Li, H. (2022). Coaching early childhood teachers: A systematic review of its effects on teacher instruction and child development. Review of Education, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1002/rev3.3343

[11] Artman-Meeker, K., Fettig, A., Barton, E. E., Penney, A., & Zeng, S. (2015). Applying an Evidence-Based Framework to the Early Childhood Coaching Literature. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 35(3), 183-196. https://doi.org/10.1177/0271121415595550

[12] Boller, K., Paulsell, D., Grosso, P. D., Blair, R., Lundquist, E., Kassow, D. Z., Kim, R., & Raikes, A. (2015). Impacts of a child care quality rating and improvement system on child care quality. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 30, 306–315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2014.10.001

[13] Cooper, D., & Costa, K. (2012). Increasing the Effectiveness and Efficiency of Existing Public Investments in Early Childhood Education Recommendations to Boost Program Outcomes and Efficiency THE ASSOCIATED PRESS/LM OTERO. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED535618.pdf

[14] EARLY CHILDHOOD DATA SYSTEMS. (n.d.). https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED607228.pdf

[15] Schilder, D., Broadstone, M., & Smith Leavell, A. (2019). Characteristics of Early Care and Education Collaboration Associated with Success. Early Education and Development, 30(8), 1029–1044. https://doi.org/10.1080/10409289.2019.1653732

[16]Burchinal, M., Kainz, K., & Cai, Y. (2011). How well do our measures of quality predict child outcomes? A meta-analysis and coordinated analysis of data from large-scale studies of early childhood settings. In M. Zaslow, I. Martinez-Beck, K. Tout, & T. Halle (Eds.), Quality measurement in early childhood settings (pp. 11–31). Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co..

Subscribe to our newsletter

Stay up to date with our work.

By subscribing, you consent to receive updates from The Prichard Committee.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

Community profile indicators

Big bold future indicators

Issue areas

Resource type

Curated toolkits

Recent resources